Research / Questionnaires
Every interview follows a written instrument, and we publish them in full here, so anyone reading a finding can see exactly what was asked to produce it.
We run three versions, one per income group. The underlying hypotheses stay identical across all three; only the framing changes. Asking a daily-wage earner and a business owner the same question in the same words would produce answers that aren't comparable: one would be answering about survival, the other about strategy. Adapting the language is what makes the comparison honest.
Our longest instrument, and deliberately so. For households living close to the margin, financial behaviour is inseparable from work itself: whether income arrives reliably, what a week of illness costs, whether money gets sent home to a village. So this version starts with work and income stability before it ever reaches the word "investment."
It also asks the gold questions most directly, because this is where the safety-net logic is easiest to see: gold bought in grams rather than lakhs, borrowed against rather than sold, chosen over instruments people have heard of but don't trust. Respondents here include auto drivers, domestic workers, factory-floor employees, and small vendors.
Section 1: Work & Income Stability
Section 2: Household Money Management
Section 3: Spending Habits & Culture
Section 4: Saving, Loans & Investment Habits
Section 5: Government Support & Future Thinking
Additional probes
Asked when time and rapport allow, often the most revealing answers in the set.
The tightest of the three. Middle-class respondents generally have surplus income, bank access, and some exposure to formal instruments, which means the interesting question is no longer whether they can save, but what they choose and why. So this version drops the work-stability groundwork and goes straight to allocation.
It's also where the three hypotheses overlap most visibly: the same household that keeps gold as a hedge is usually the one negotiating who decides when to pledge it, and the one budgeting for a function whose scale relatives will notice. The ₹1,00,000 question here is a direct comparison point against the ₹1 lakh question in the low-income set.
Basic financial behaviour
Gold & contingency planning
Women & household financial decisions
Festivals, events & social identity
The most open-ended of the three. Here, constraint mostly isn't the story; choice is. Respondents have access to every instrument available, professional advice if they want it, and no real liquidity pressure, so asking "do you save?" would tell us nothing. Instead this version asks about philosophy, trust, and what they deliberately avoid.
It's the sharpest test of our gold hypothesis. If gold were purely a poverty-driven workaround for limited access, it should disappear at this income level. Asking which asset class someone trusts most, when they could pick anything, is how we find out whether the cultural logic survives affluence, or is replaced by it.
Section 1: Financial Identity & Money Philosophy
Section 2: Spending Behaviour & Lifestyle Choices
Section 3: Saving, Investment & Risk Mindset
Section 4: Family, Gender & Decision-Making
Section 5: Culture, Legacy & Future Thinking
We're always looking for households willing to sit down for a conversation.
Participate in the study